Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Upper Airway Soft Tissue Structures in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Authors

  • Metin Yılmaz Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Ankara
  • Mehmet Düzlü Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Ankara
  • Murat Uçar Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara
  • Hakan Tutar Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Ankara
  • Recep Karamert Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Ankara
  • Tansu Ulukavak Çiftci Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Respiratory Diseases Sleep Disorders Center, Ankara
  • Nil Tokgöz Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara
  • Oğuz Köktürk Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Respiratory Diseases Sleep Disorders Center, Ankara

Abstract

Background/Aim: We aimed to compare the size of upper airway soft tissue structures between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients and normal controls by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: Sixty-eight subjects available with neck MRI and polysomnography (PSG) were retrospectively included in the study. The subjects were divided into two groups according to apnea hypopnea indexes (AHI). The subjects with AHI more than 5 were considered to be OSA and the subjects with AHI less than 5 were considered to be controls.  In all cases volume of the tongue, cross-sectional area of the uvula and upper airway volume were measured with MRI.

Results: No significant difference revealed between controls and OSA patients regarding demographic data, BMI, tongue volume, soft palate volume, upper airway volume, arousal index and basal oxygen saturation (P > 0.05).  Tongue volume was found to be significantly greater in males compared to females in both study and control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In this study there was no significant difference between OSA patients and controls regarding volume of upper airway and soft tissue structures. However significant difference revealed in comparison of upper airway sizes in opposite genders. Thus, gender may play an important role in determining upper airway soft tissue sizes. 

References

Coleman JA. Pathophysiology of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. In: Fairbanks DN, Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea, 3rd edition, 2003. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA.

Schwab RJ, Gupta KB, Gefter WB, Metzger LJ, Hoffman EA, Pack AI. Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 1673-1689.

Fairbanks DN. Snoring. A general overview with historical perspectives. In: Fairbanks DN, Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea, 3rd edition, 2003. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA.

Rechtschaffen A, Kales A. A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system of sleep stages in human subjects. Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute, University of California, 1968. Los Angeles, USA.

Schwab RJ. Upper airway imaging. Clin Chest Med 1998; 19: 33-54.

Schwab RJ. Imaging for the snoring and sleep apnea patient. Dent Clin North Am 2001; 45: 759-796.

Whittle AT, Marshall I, Mortimore IL, Wraith PK, Sellar RJ, Douglas NJ. Neck soft tissue and fat distribution: comparison between normal men and women by magnetic resonance imaging. Thorax 1999; 54: 323-328.

Lowe AA, Gionhaku N, Takeuchi K, Fleetham JA. Three-dimensional CT reconstructions of tongue and airway in adult subjects with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 364-374.

Ryan CF, Lowe AA, Li D, Fleetham JA. Three-dimensional upper airway computed tomography in obstructive sleep apnea. A prospective study in patients treated by uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144: 428-432.

Okubo M, Suzuki M, Horiuchi A, Okabe S, Ikeda K, Higano S, Mitani H, Hida W, Kobayashi T, Sugawara J. Morphologic analyses of mandible and upper airway soft tissue by MRI of patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome Sleep. 2006; 29: 909-915.

Schotland HM, Insko EK, Schwab RJ. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates alterations of the lingual musculature in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 1999; 22: 605-613.

Schwab RJ, Goldberg AN. Upper airway assessment: radiographic and other imaging techniques. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1998; 31: 931-968.

Horner RL, Mohiaddin RH, Lowell DG, Shea SA, Burman ED, Longmore DB. Sites and sizes of fat deposits around the pharynx in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea and weight matched controls. Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 613-622.

Ciscar MA, Juan G, Martínez V, Ramón M, Lloret T, Mínguez J, Armengot M, Marín J, Basterra J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pharynx in OSA patients and healthy subjects. Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 79-86.

Battagel JM, Johal A, Kotecha B. A cephalometric comparison of subjects with snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 353-365.

Paoli JR, Lauwers F, Lacassagne L, Tiberge M, Dodart L, Boutault F. Craniofacial differences according to the body mass index of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: cephalometric study in 85 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 39: 40-45.

Yucel A, Unlu M, Haktanir A, Acar M, Fidan F. Evaluation of the upper airway cross-sectional area changes in different degrees of severity of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: cephalometric and dynamic CT study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2624-2629.

Bradley TD, Brown IG, Grossman RF, Zamel N, Martinez D, Phillipson EA, Hoffstein V. Pharyngeal size in snorers, nonsnorers, and patients with obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1327-1331.

Downloads

Published

22.05.2021

Issue

Section

Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2